Searching for inclusive national identity Finland 3831 Josefina Sipinen <a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4011-278X"><img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&ssl=1" alt='' /></a> Natalia Skogberg (THL) <a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8829-4159"><img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&ssl=1" alt='' /></a> Pasi Saukkonen (City of Helsinki) Hanna Wass (UH) Maaret Vuorenmaa (THL) <a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0258-0550"><img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&ssl=1" alt='' /></a> Nina Halme (THL) Eero Lilja Katja Wikström (THL) <a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8716-2875"><img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&ssl=1" alt='' /></a> Jonna Ikonen (THL) <a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-2449"><img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&ssl=1" alt='' /></a> Johanna Peltoniemi (UH) <a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8299-8139"><img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&ssl=1" alt='' /></a> Annina Claesson <a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-2406"><img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&ssl=1" alt='' /></a> 2021-07-19 2000-01-01 Only those with sample size 150 or larger The topics of the survey are particularly well suited for the study of the integration of EMMs in Finland and the survey includes a sizeable number or EMM respondents (even if smaller than 400) Searching for inclusive national identity SINI Searching for inclusive national identity FIS005 Professor Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti and her team at University of Helsinki Professor Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti and her team at University of Helsinki Demographic characteristics/behaviours Identity (ethnic, national, racial, religious) and belonging Interethnic contact and conflict Public attitudes about migration and migrants Demography.Migration SocialStratificationAndGroupings.Minorities SocietyAndCulture.CulturalAndNationalIdentity 2014-06 2014-09 Finland Professor Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti and her team at the University of Helsinki [Total] Russian immigrants Estonian immigrants 1600 800 800 Professor Inga Jasinskaja (inga.jasinskaja@helsinki.fi) SINI data consists of altogether 461 respondents (response rate for the whole sample was 28.8%). 65.7 % of the respondents were females and mean age was 44 years (SD=11,77). 246 respondents were Russian-speaking immigrants (response rate 26,9 %). 67,1 percent of them were females and the mean age was 42,9 years (SD = 11,98). Self-reported ethnic group of the most of the Russian-speaking immigrants was Russian (73.7 %). 17.5 percent were Finns or Ingrian Finns, and 8.6 percent of the Russian-speaking respondents had some other ethnic background. 215 respondents were Estonian immigrants (response rate 30.8 %). 64.2 percent of them were females and the mean age was 46.1 years (SD = 11,33). 93.5 percent were Estonians, 2.8 percent were Finns and 2.3 percent named some other group as their own ethnic group Survey in development/not yet completed: No Professor Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti: nga.jasinskaja@helsinki.fi Technical survey documentation Unknown availability Questionnaire Unknown availability Not applicable Any other publications The survey questionnaire consists of demographics, ethnicity, neighbourhood composition, languages known/used, measures of intergroup contact (quantity, quality, see e.g. Pettigrew et al., 2007), intergroup anxiety (Hewstone & Brown, 2005), cultural identity (ethnic, national; see e.g. Mlicki & Ellemers, 1996), threats and gains expected to result from immigration (e.g. Stephan et al. 2008), acculturation attitudes and expectations (non-dominant group preferences, dominant group expectations; Berry et al. 1997), perceived discrimination (see e.g. Berry et al., 2006), support for multicultural ideology (Berry & Kalin, 1995), and intergroup attitudes (see Liebkind et al., 2006; Jaakkola, 1999)