<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!-- module name : ethmigsurveydataDDIPrototype.xml -->
<!-- module in-charge : alexandre.mairot@sciencespo.fr (CDSP) -->
<!-- module title : PROTOTYPE DDI2 ETHMIGSURVEYDATA -->
<!-- module program : XML DDI -->
<!-- module version date : 2019-06-21 -->
<codeBook xmlns="ddi:codebook:2_5" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" ID="SKN011" xml:lang="en" version="2.5" xsi:schemaLocation="ddi:codebook:2_5 http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-Codebook/2.5/XMLSchema/codebook.xsd">
  <docDscr>
    <citation>
      <titlStmt>
        <titl>Roma pilot survey 2011</titl>
      </titlStmt>
      <dcterms:spatial>Slovakia</dcterms:spatial>
      <dc:identifier>2787</dc:identifier>
      <dc:contributor>Daniel Skobla &lt;a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-1094"&gt;&lt;img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&amp;ssl=1" alt='' /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</dc:contributor>
      <dcterms:modified>2022-05-16</dcterms:modified>
      <dcterms:temporal>2000-01-01</dcterms:temporal>
      <dc:coverage>All nationwide quantitative surveys are covered</dc:coverage>
      <dc:coverage>Given that the area of EMM is under researched in Slovakia, ALL general population surveys with a substantial sub-sample of EMMs were included. It should be noted however that for the Labour Force Survey (VZPS), not all of the waves since 2000 have been covered; this is because documentation for just 2018 and 2019 were available</dc:coverage>
    </citation>
  </docDscr>
  <stdyDscr>
    <citation>
      <titlStmt>
        <titl>Roma pilot survey 2011</titl>
        <parTitl xml:lang="en">Roma pilot survey 2011</parTitl>
        <IDNo>SKN011</IDNo>
      </titlStmt>
      <prodStmt>
        <producer>Focus SK; Gallup Europe; European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)</producer>
        <copyright>European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)</copyright>
      </prodStmt>
      <distStmt>
        <distrbtr>European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)</distrbtr>
      </distStmt>
    </citation>
    <stdyInfo>
      <subject>
        <keyword>Citizenship and naturalization</keyword>
        <keyword>Demographic characteristics/behaviours</keyword>
        <keyword>Discrimination, racism, xenophobia and/or social exclusion</keyword>
        <keyword>Educational attainment/trajectory, human capital, skills</keyword>
        <keyword>Housing/housing access</keyword>
        <keyword>Health/health access</keyword>
        <keyword>Financial situation and/or economic inequality</keyword>
        <keyword>Interethnic contact and conflict</keyword>
        <keyword>Labour market integration and/or socioeconomic mobility</keyword>
        <keyword>Migration trajectory (past/future)</keyword>
        <keyword>Political inclusion and participation, and social/political attitudes</keyword>
        <keyword>Reasons for migration/migration drivers</keyword>
        <keyword>Social cohesion and/or civic engagement and/or networks</keyword>
        <keyword>Other</keyword>
        <keyword>General life satisfaction</keyword>
        <topcClas>Demography.Migration</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.Minorities</topcClas>
        <topcClas>Economics.EconomicConditionsAndIndicators</topcClas>
        <topcClas>Economics.IncomePropertyAndInvestmentSaving</topcClas>
        <topcClas>LabourAndEmployment.Employment</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.SocialAndOccupationalMobility</topcClas>
        <topcClas>Politics.PoliticalBehaviourAndAttitudes</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocietyAndCulture.SocialBehaviourAndAttitudes</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialWelfarePolicyAndSystems.SpecificSocialServicesUseAndAvailability</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.EqualityInequalityAndSocialExclusion</topcClas>
        <topcClas>HousingAndLandUse.Housing</topcClas>
      </subject>
      <sumDscr>
        <collDate event="start">2011-05-20</collDate>
        <collDate event="end">2011-07-20</collDate>
        <collDate cycle="Roma pilot survey 2011"></collDate>
        <nation abbr="SK">Slovakia</nation>
        <geogCover><![CDATA[
National
]]></geogCover>
        <universe clusion="I"><![CDATA[
A combination of minors and adults
Both men and women
]]></universe>
      </sumDscr>
      <notes subject="subsurvey">
2011-05-22,
No other waves
</notes>
      <notes subject="inclusion in a large survey">
2.5: The survey covered 11 Member States (those listed in 2.5 plus the country corresponding to this record) and these countries were strategically chosen. Specifically, they were chosen because of the notable proportion of Roma in the population and the assumption that in most of these countries the Roma were living in a high concentration in specific areas (which was a necessary condition for employing probability sampling given the resource and time constraints). Moreover, in seven of these 11 countries (i.e. Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia), the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) had already gained experience in interviewing the Roma via its EU-MIDIS I survey.
</notes>
    </stdyInfo>
    <method>
      <dataColl>
        <timeMeth method="Single cross-section"></timeMeth>
        <dataCollector>Focus SK; Gallup Europe</dataCollector>
        <sampProc><![CDATA[
Survey include subgroup of majority pop: Yes
Survey designed as a general population survey: No
Sampling strategy - closed: Random sampling/selection (i.e. probability sampling, of some kind)
Sampling strategy - open: Multi-stage probability sample (random route, focused enumeration, and systematic sampling)
]]></sampProc>
        <sampleFrame>
          <txt><![CDATA[
Representative of the population: Yes
Sample design - full information: Random route, focused enumeration, and systematic sampling was used for sampling the Roma respondents, whereas random route and systematic sampling was used for sampling non-Roma respondents. For random route, interviewers started from designated starting points, following precise instructions for their route. The interviewers were required to apply a sampling step of five, where they make contact with the household in every fifth dwelling unit. As needed, the random route rules were adapted to circumvent particular challenges faced by the interviewers. As for focused enumeration, it was then used to supplement random route to increase the chances of identifying eligible households of the hard-to-reach population. Specifically, interviewers asked respondents in households already included in the sample to provide information on the eligibility of surrounding households. Two dwellings on either side of the initial household were then screened for the presence of eligible Roma households. Based on the information received, the interviewer had to determine whether there are eligible persons at the adjacent addresses. Finally, for systematic sampling, interviewers applied the systematic sampling approach only when the number of identifiable Roma dwelling units was too small to realistically complete the planned number of interviews by selecting every fifth household through the random route approach.
]]></txt>
          <universe clusion="I"><![CDATA[
EMM Target population: which minority group(s): Roma
Was the EMM target population…: A selection of residents of ethnic minority identification in the city/region/country                        
Operationalization of target population: Ethnic self-identification of respondent (one response allowed); Classification by geographical location; 
]]></universe>
          <frameUnit ID="frameUnit_total">
            <unitType numberOfUnits="00000"><![CDATA[
Size of the EMM target pop. as a whole: 360000
Sampling units: Municipalities; Households; Individuals
]]></unitType>
            <txt>[Total]</txt>
          </frameUnit>
          <frameUnit ID="frameUnit_sg1">
            <unitType></unitType>
            <txt>Roma</txt>
          </frameUnit>
          <frameUnit ID="frameUnit_sg2">
            <unitType></unitType>
            <txt>Non-Roma</txt>
          </frameUnit>
        </sampleFrame>
        <targetSampleSize>
          <sampleSize ID="sampleSize_total">1600</sampleSize>
        </targetSampleSize>
        <targetSampleSize>
          <sampleSize ID="sampleSize_sg1">1100</sampleSize>
        </targetSampleSize>
        <targetSampleSize>
          <sampleSize ID="sampleSize_sg2">500</sampleSize>
        </targetSampleSize>
        <collMode>
</collMode>
        <sources>
          <srcDocu>Technical report: https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-roma-pilot-survey-technical-report_en.pdf ; Survey results: https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/2099-FRA-2012-Roma-at-a-glance_EN.pdf</srcDocu>
        </sources>
        <collSitu><![CDATA[
Who interviewed: Professional interviewers only
Questionnaire in migrant language: No
Number of questions: 114
]]></collSitu>
        <weight><![CDATA[
Are weights provided: Yes
Description: Within-household selection probability weighting was applied. Such design weighting corrected for differential selection probabilities of the individual within the household as a function of the number of persons in the household belonging to the survey target group.
]]></weight>
      </dataColl>
      <notes subject="sampling method">4.4: The available documentation does not specify the sampling frame(s) used. However, it mentions the following: (a) sampling frames for the survey were developed using information collection during background research; the collected information was then used to construct sampling frames by establishing lists of primary sampling units (which varied from country to country). (b) In each country, the sampling frame was intended to reflect the diversity of the Roma groups in terms of community size and geographic distribution so that the survey results would be representative of their situation.</notes>
      <notes subject="data collection">7.2: FRA developed the survey questionnaire, which Gallup Europe and its national fieldwork agencies then translated and used in face-to-face interviews in the different participating countries. The available documentation however does not specify if the face-to-face interviews were PAPI or CAPI. 7.8: The average duration/length of the interview varied by subgroup (Roma = 42, Non-Roma =36). 7.9: The figure listed reflects the total number of questions found in the Roma questionnaire; this can be considered as the "full" questionnaire as the non-Roma questionnaire is exactly the same as the Roma questionnaire with just some questions removed and with some slight wording changes.</notes>
      <anlyInfo>
        <respRate ID="respRate_total"><![CDATA[
Total net/achieved sample: 1600
]]></respRate>
        <respRate ID="respRate_sg1"><![CDATA[
SG1 net/achieved sample: 1100
SG1 Response rate: 90.1
SG1 Overall response rate calculated: AAPOR                                         ]]></respRate>
        <respRate ID="respRate_sg2"><![CDATA[
SG2 net/achieved sample: 500
SG2 Response rate: 75.9
SG2 Overall response rate calculated: AAPOR                                         ]]></respRate>
      </anlyInfo>
      <stdyClas>Survey in development/not yet completed: No</stdyClas>
    </method>
    <dataAccs>
      <setAvail>
        <avlStatus><![CDATA[
Availability of the survey dataset: Unknown availability
Access to aggregate data results: Yes
]]></avlStatus>
      </setAvail>
      <notes>8.7: The survey dataset is not publicly available but there is an online tool that allows for data visualization, available at:  https://fra.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/data-and-maps/survey-discrimination-and-social-exclusion-roma-eu-2011 . 8.13: DOI is not available in http format. 8.16: The questionnaires are provided in the annex of the technical report.</notes>
    </dataAccs>
    <othrStdyMat>
      <relMat ID="relMat_technical">
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>Technical survey documentation</titl>
          </titlStmt>
          <verStmt>
            <version>doi:10.2811/49351</version>
          </verStmt>
          <biblCit>European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2013, Roma Pilot Survey Technical report: methodology, sampling and fieldwork, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-9239-291-8, doi:10.2811/49351</biblCit>
          <holdings URI="https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-roma-pilot-survey-technical-report_en.pdf"></holdings>
          <dcterms:available>Yes, publicly available</dcterms:available>
          <dcterms:conformsTo>No specific standard</dcterms:conformsTo>
          <dc:language>English</dc:language>
          <dc:language>ENG</dc:language>
        </citation>
      </relMat>
      <relMat ID="relMat_questionnaire">
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>Questionnaire</titl>
          </titlStmt>
          <holdings URI="https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-roma-pilot-survey-technical-report_en.pdf"></holdings>
          <dcterms:available>Publicly available</dcterms:available>
          <dc:language>English</dc:language>
          <dc:language>ENG</dc:language>
        </citation>
      </relMat>
      <relStdy>
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>Roma pilot survey 2011</titl>
            <parTitl xml:lang="en">Roma pilot survey 2011</parTitl>
            <IDNo>RPS2011</IDNo>
          </titlStmt>
          <dcterms:spatial>Bulgaria; Czech Republic; France; Greece; Hungary; Italy; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Spain</dcterms:spatial>
        </citation>
      </relStdy>
      <relStdy>
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>No</titl>
          </titlStmt>
        </citation>
      </relStdy>
      <othRefs>
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>Any other publications</titl>
          </titlStmt>
          <biblCit>European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2012, The situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States Survey results at a glance, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-9192-932-0, doi: 10.2811/76056</biblCit>
        </citation>
      </othRefs>
    </othrStdyMat>
    <notes subject="general identification information">1.9: Per the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), the survey can be considered representative of the Roma living in areas where they reside in greater density than the national average in a given country. As for the non-Roma sample of this survey, the survey can be considered representative of the non-Roma persons living in or near areas where Roma live in greater density than the national average of a given country; as such, the non-Roma sample is not representative of the general population of a given country (as reflected in the averages of national statistics). 1.15: Respondents were 16 years old and older.</notes>
    <notes subject="any other comments">(1) In 2011, two parallel and complementary Roma-targeted surveys were carried in the EU. The first survey, the Regional Roma 2011 survey (its unique ID in the EMM Survey Registry is RRS2011) was undertaken by the UNDP and the World Bank; the second survey, the Roma pilot survey 2011 (which corresponds to the survey covered in this record) was undertaken by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). To facilitate access to information about these two surveys, the report, The situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States (https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/2099-FRA-2012-Roma-at-a-glance_EN.pdf), was produced; specifically, this report covers results and findings from these two surveys. (2) The survey methodology developed and used in the Roma pilot survey 2011 was a collaborative effort involving experts and partners specializing in Roma research. As such, the view of FRA is that the methodology for this survey can be used as a guide for future data collection efforts aimed at studying the situation of Roma in the EU.</notes>
  </stdyDscr>
  <fileDscr>
    <fileTxt>
      <fileCont><![CDATA[
Migrant/minority related questions: Country of birth of respondent; Nationality of respondent (current); Ethnic self-identification of respondent (one response allowed); Mother tongue/language related question;                 
]]></fileCont>
    </fileTxt>
  </fileDscr>
</codeBook>