<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!-- module name : ethmigsurveydataDDIPrototype.xml -->
<!-- module in-charge : alexandre.mairot@sciencespo.fr (CDSP) -->
<!-- module title : PROTOTYPE DDI2 ETHMIGSURVEYDATA -->
<!-- module program : XML DDI -->
<!-- module version date : 2019-06-21 -->
<codeBook xmlns="ddi:codebook:2_5" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" ID="CHS004" xml:lang="en" version="2.5" xsi:schemaLocation="ddi:codebook:2_5 http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-Codebook/2.5/XMLSchema/codebook.xsd">
  <docDscr>
    <citation>
      <titlStmt>
        <titl>The Integration of the European Second Generation</titl>
      </titlStmt>
      <dcterms:spatial>Switzerland</dcterms:spatial>
      <dc:identifier>2214</dc:identifier>
      <dc:contributor>Natalia-Cornelia Malancu &lt;a target='_blank' href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-2422"&gt;&lt;img class="inline ml-1" src="https://i0.wp.com/info.orcid.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/orcid_16x16.gif?resize=16%2C16&amp;ssl=1" alt='' /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</dc:contributor>
      <dcterms:modified>2019-05-05</dcterms:modified>
      <dcterms:temporal>2006-02-01</dcterms:temporal>
      <dcterms:temporal>N/A</dcterms:temporal>
      <dc:coverage>All subnational surveys irrespective of sample size</dc:coverage>
      <dc:coverage>N/A</dc:coverage>
    </citation>
  </docDscr>
  <stdyDscr>
    <citation>
      <titlStmt>
        <altTitl>TIES</altTitl>
        <parTitl xml:lang="en">The Integration of the European Second Generation</parTitl>
        <IDNo>CHS004</IDNo>
      </titlStmt>
      <prodStmt>
        <copyright>Université de Neuchâtel</copyright>
      </prodStmt>
      <distStmt>
        <distrbtr>Université de Neuchâtel</distrbtr>
      </distStmt>
    </citation>
    <stdyInfo>
      <subject>
        <keyword>Asylum seekers and refugee issues</keyword>
        <keyword>Citizenship and naturalization</keyword>
        <keyword>Economic, cultural, digital, leisure and media consumption</keyword>
        <keyword>Demographic characteristics/behaviours</keyword>
        <keyword>Discrimination, racism, xenophobia and/or social exclusion</keyword>
        <keyword>Educational attainment/trajectory, human capital, skills</keyword>
        <keyword>Family reunification, marriage, family relations</keyword>
        <keyword>Gender relations, gender identity, sexuality</keyword>
        <keyword>Housing/housing access</keyword>
        <keyword>Health/health access</keyword>
        <keyword>Identity (ethnic, national, racial, religious) and belonging</keyword>
        <keyword>Financial situation and/or economic inequality</keyword>
        <keyword>Interethnic contact and conflict</keyword>
        <keyword>Labour market integration and/or socioeconomic mobility</keyword>
        <keyword>Language skills/training</keyword>
        <keyword>Leisure, sports and art activities</keyword>
        <keyword>Legal status/administrative situation</keyword>
        <keyword>Migration trajectory (past/future)</keyword>
        <keyword>Political inclusion and participation, and social/political attitudes</keyword>
        <keyword>Public attitudes about migration and  migrants</keyword>
        <keyword>Reasons for migration/migration drivers</keyword>
        <keyword>Return migration</keyword>
        <keyword>Social cohesion and/or civic engagement and/or networks</keyword>
        <keyword>Space use, spatial consequences</keyword>
        <keyword>Transnational patterns (e.g. remittances, travel, engagement with ‘home’ country politics, etc.) and diasporas</keyword>
        <keyword>Religion</keyword>
        <topcClas>Demography.Migration</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.Minorities</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocietyAndCulture.CulturalAndNationalIdentity</topcClas>
        <topcClas>Economics.EconomicConditionsAndIndicators</topcClas>
        <topcClas>Economics.IncomePropertyAndInvestmentSaving</topcClas>
        <topcClas>LabourAndEmployment.Employment</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.SocialAndOccupationalMobility</topcClas>
        <topcClas>MediaCommunicationAndLanguage.LanguageAndLinguistics</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocietyAndCulture.LeisureTourismAndSport</topcClas>
        <topcClas>Politics.PoliticalBehaviourAndAttitudes</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocietyAndCulture.SocialBehaviourAndAttitudes</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocietyAndCulture.ReligionAndValues</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.EqualityInequalityAndSocialExclusion</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.FamilyLifeAndMarriage</topcClas>
        <topcClas>SocialStratificationAndGroupings.GenderAndGenderRoles</topcClas>
        <topcClas>HousingAndLandUse.Housing</topcClas>
      </subject>
      <sumDscr>
        <collDate event="start">2007</collDate>
        <collDate event="end">2008</collDate>
        <collDate cycle="The Integration of the European Second Generation"></collDate>
        <nation abbr="CH">Switzerland</nation>
        <geogCover><![CDATA[
Subnational
Cities
Zurich
Zürich
CH040 (NUTS3)
CH0261 (LAU)
Cities (densely populated areas)
]]></geogCover>
        <universe clusion="I"><![CDATA[
Adult population (18+ or 15+) only
Both men and women
]]></universe>
      </sumDscr>
      <notes subject="subsurvey">
2005,
0
</notes>
      <notes subject="inclusion in a large survey">
Regarding variable 2.9: 2005 is listed as the date when the survey first became a part of the larger study because 2005 is when the project started
</notes>
    </stdyInfo>
    <method>
      <dataColl>
        <timeMeth method="Single cross-section"></timeMeth>
        <sampProc><![CDATA[
Pooled sample: 2, Basel, No                                        
Survey include subgroup of majority pop: Yes
Survey designed as a general population survey: No
Sampling strategy - closed: Mixed sampling procedures (in which there are elements of probability sampling, such as Centre-location sampling)
Sampling strategy - open: As a preparatory activity for designing the sampling strategy, the 2000 census was analysed in order to determine the spatial distribution of the three study groups within the boundaries of the two city agglomerations. As a first step, two strata had to be defined in each city. The Turkish stratum and the Yugoslavian stratum each comprised all communes in a city in which at least twenty members of the respective study groups resided. Communes with smaller numbers were excluded. The objective was to sample 250 respondents in each stratum. This was realised by first drawing a sample of communes and then sampling a fixed number of study group members within each sampled commune. If a particular commune was selected in both strata, a fixed number of Turkish and former Yugoslavian respondents was sampled and interviewed in that commune. As a second step,  the numbers of communes and respondents of each study group was determined : 5 Turkish respondents in each of 50 clusters (5 x 50 = 250) and 6  former Yugoslavian respondents in each of 42 clusters (6 x 42 = 252). This strategy implied that the target sample of 250 comparison group members was to be redistributed over the two strata according to the ratio of clusters to be sampled from the 2 strata (i.e. 136 in the Turkish stratum, 114 in the Yugoslavian stratum). As  a third step, communes and respondents were sampled by applying the systematic selection method. The method led to self-weighing samples in each stratum and each city. Once this step was completed, commune authorities were requested to provide access to their commune registers, allowing researchers to identify and sample names and addresses of potential respondents from each study group. Due to cooperation issues, some sampled communes had to be replaced by ones with a similar proportion of relevant second generation residents. As non-response turned out to be high, it was necessary to repeatedly sample from the same name register in sampled communes. In some communes, the list of names was eventually depleted and names had to be selected from other communes, thus distorting the sample design
]]></sampProc>
        <sampleFrame>
          <txt><![CDATA[
Representative of the population: Yes
Sample design - full information: The onomastic method was applied to commune-level population registers to identify all persons who were 18 to 35 years old and who had forenames or surnames linguistically akin to Turkish and Yugoslavian names
]]></txt>
          <universe clusion="I"><![CDATA[
EMM Target population: which minority group(s): Second-generation Turks; Second-generation former Yugoslavians
Was the EMM target population…: A selection of residents of foreign/immigrant origin or ancestry in the city/region/country                        
Operationalization of target population: Country of birth of respondent; Country of birth of parents/grandparents; Classification by geographical location; 
Sampling frame(s): Municipality register (a system of commune-level personal registers interlinked across cities)
]]></universe>
          <frameUnit ID="frameUnit_total">
            <unitType numberOfUnits="00000"><![CDATA[
Size of the EMM target pop. as a whole: 19704
Sampling units: Household (primary); Individual (secondary)
]]></unitType>
            <txt>[Total]</txt>
          </frameUnit>
          <frameUnit ID="frameUnit_sg1">
            <unitType></unitType>
            <txt>Turkish individuals (descendants of immigrants from Turkey)</txt>
          </frameUnit>
          <frameUnit ID="frameUnit_sg2">
            <unitType></unitType>
            <txt>Yugoslavian individuals (descendants of immigrants from Yugoslavia)</txt>
          </frameUnit>
        </sampleFrame>
        <collMode>
Face to face (CAPI/CAMI); Paper self-administered (collected); 
</collMode>
        <sources>
          <srcDocu>Principal Investigator, Rosita Fibbi (rosita.fibbi@unine.ch); http://oapen.org</srcDocu>
        </sources>
        <collSitu><![CDATA[
Who interviewed: Professional interviewers only
Interviewers spoke migrant languages: No, nobody had targeted language skills                                                             Questionnaire in migrant language: No
Number of questions: 509
]]></collSitu>
        <weight><![CDATA[
Are weights provided: Yes
Description: Sampling design weights were by group and region. Weights were by age
]]></weight>
      </dataColl>
      <notes subject="data collection">Regarding variable 7.9: 509 questions were included in the questionnaire to the target population. 446 questions were included in the questionnaire to the native population</notes>
      <anlyInfo>
        <respRate ID="respRate_total"><![CDATA[
Total net/achieved sample: 643
Overall response rate: 36
]]></respRate>
        <respRate ID="respRate_sg1"><![CDATA[
SG1 net/achieved sample: 206
SG1 Response rate: 38.2
]]></respRate>
        <respRate ID="respRate_sg2"><![CDATA[
SG2 net/achieved sample: 235
SG2 Response rate: 29.7
]]></respRate>
        <dataAppr ID="dataAppr_total">In Swiss cities,  easy-to-reach and difficult-to-reach respondents do not appear to differ in terms of age, sex or educational attainment</dataAppr>
      </anlyInfo>
      <stdyClas>Survey in development/not yet completed: No</stdyClas>
    </method>
    <dataAccs>
      <setAvail>
        <accsPlac>Principal Investigator, Rosita Fibbi (rosita.fibbi@unine.ch)</accsPlac>
        <avlStatus><![CDATA[
Availability of the survey dataset: Available by request
Access to complete dataset: Yes, micro-data available for download/direct access by researchers
Access to portions of dataset: Not applicable (full dataset accessible)
Access to aggregate data results: No
]]></avlStatus>
      </setAvail>
      <notes>Regarding variable 8.14: The document listed is a technical report in a loose sense; it is a document that summarises the technical aspects</notes>
    </dataAccs>
    <othrStdyMat>
      <relMat ID="relMat_technical">
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>Technical survey documentation</titl>
            <IDNo>426534</IDNo>
          </titlStmt>
          <verStmt>
            <version>https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_426534</version>
          </verStmt>
          <biblCit>Crul, M., Schneider, J. &amp; Lelie, F. (eds.) (2012), The European second generation compared: Does the integration context matter? IMISCOE Research, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 436 p</biblCit>
          <holdings URI="https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/34469"></holdings>
          <dcterms:available>Yes, publicly available</dcterms:available>
          <dcterms:conformsTo>No specific standard</dcterms:conformsTo>
          <dc:language>English</dc:language>
          <dc:language>ENG</dc:language>
        </citation>
      </relMat>
      <relMat ID="relMat_questionnaire">
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>Questionnaire</titl>
          </titlStmt>
          <holdings URI="Principal Investigator, Rosita Fibbi (rosita.fibbi@unine.ch)"></holdings>
          <dcterms:available>Available by request</dcterms:available>
          <dc:language>English; German</dc:language>
          <dc:language>ENG</dc:language>
          <dc:language>DEU</dc:language>
        </citation>
      </relMat>
      <relStdy>
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>The Integration of the European Second Generation</titl>
            <altTitl>TIES</altTitl>
            <parTitl xml:lang="en">The Integration of the European Second Generation</parTitl>
            <IDNo>TIE2005</IDNo>
          </titlStmt>
          <dcterms:spatial>Amsterdam (Netherlands); Antwerp (Belgium); Barcelona (Spain); Berlin (Germany); Brussels (Belgium); Frankfurt (Germany); Linz (Austria); Madrid (Spain); Paris (France); Rotterdam (Netherlands); Stockholm (Sweden); Strasbourg (France); Vienna (Austria)</dcterms:spatial>
        </citation>
      </relStdy>
      <relStdy>
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>No</titl>
          </titlStmt>
        </citation>
      </relStdy>
      <othRefs>
        <citation>
          <titlStmt>
            <titl>Any other publications</titl>
          </titlStmt>
          <biblCit>Fibbi, R., Wanner, P., Topgul, C. &amp; Ugrina, D. (2015), The New Second Generation in Switzerland. Youth of Turkish and Former Yugoslav Descent in Zürich and Basel. IMISCOE Research, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 315p</biblCit>
        </citation>
      </othRefs>
    </othrStdyMat>
  </stdyDscr>
  <fileDscr>
    <fileTxt>
      <fileCont><![CDATA[
Migrant/minority related questions: Country of birth of respondent; Country of birth of parents; Nationality of respondent (current); Nationality of parents (current); Ethnic self-identification of respondent (multiple responses allowed); Mother tongue/language related question;                 
Dataset language(s) available: English; ENG                
]]></fileCont>
    </fileTxt>
    <notes>Regarding variable 3.5: In Switzerland, the number of residents with a migration background is difficult to determine because administrative records do not record parental birthplace or whether Swiss nationality has been gained by birth or naturalisation. Population figures were therefore estimated on the basis of the 2000 Swiss census and the times series of recorded numbers of immigrants by origin in the central aliens register. The total population is 4,967 (Turkish); 14,737 (Former Yugoslavian)</notes>
  </fileDscr>
</codeBook>